Short answer
Recomendação OAB 001/2024 is a non-binding but authoritative guidance issued by the Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB) on the ethical use of generative AI in legal practice. It establishes baseline responsibilities for lawyers—including transparency, human oversight, data confidentiality, and verification of AI outputs—without creating new statutory obligations.
TL;DR
- Issued on 12 March 2024 by the OAB’s National Ethics and Discipline Tribunal (CETED).
- Applies to all OAB-registered attorneys practicing in Brazil, including in-house counsel and public defenders.
- Requires lawyers to disclose AI use to clients when it materially affects legal advice or documentation.
- Mandates human review and validation of all AI-generated legal texts before submission or client delivery.
- Prohibits delegation of core professional judgment (e.g., case strategy, ethical assessment) to AI systems.
- Aligns with Article 2º of the OAB Statute (Law No. 8.906/1994), reinforcing the lawyer’s irreplaceable role in justice administration.
O que é a Recomendação OAB 001/2024?
It is a formal, publicly issued recommendation—not a resolution, statute, or regulation—adopted unanimously by CETED, the OAB’s highest ethics body. Unlike binding disciplinary rules, it provides interpretive guidance on how existing professional duties (e.g., confidentiality under Article 32 of the OAB Code of Ethics) apply to AI tools. Its authority derives from the OAB’s constitutional mandate (Article 133 of the Federal Constitution) to regulate the legal profession and uphold the integrity of legal services.
Por que ela importa para advogados brasileiros?
Because it operationalizes long-standing ethical principles for a high-risk technical context. Generative AI introduces novel vulnerabilities: hallucinated case law, unattributed sources, jurisdictional misalignment (e.g., citing STJ rulings as if binding on state courts), and insecure data handling. The Recommendation responds by requiring affirmative steps—like verifying citations against official databases (e.g., DJE, STF Jurisprudência em Tese) and auditing prompts for bias or overreach—before relying on AI outputs in client work.
Como ela se relaciona com outras normas brasileiras?
It does not amend or override laws, regulations, or court rules. It complements them: e.g., its confidentiality requirements reinforce Article 7º of Resolution CNJ 392/2021 (on digital platforms in justice), while its verification mandate echoes BCB Circular 4.195/2023’s emphasis on human-in-the-loop controls for automated decision-making in regulated sectors. Critically, it references no foreign frameworks—its analysis is grounded solely in Brazilian constitutional and statutory law, OAB norms, and national jurisprudence.
FAQ
- Q: Is Recomendação OAB 001/2024 legally binding?
- A: No—it is ethically binding as interpretive guidance under the OAB’s self-regulatory authority, but breach does not trigger automatic sanctions; violations may inform disciplinary proceedings under existing rules (e.g., OAB Code of Ethics Art. 34).
- Q: Does it ban AI use in law firms?
- A: No—it explicitly permits and encourages responsible adoption, provided lawyers retain full professional accountability for all outputs.
- Q: Must lawyers document their AI usage for every client matter?
- A: Not universally—but documentation is strongly advised, especially where AI assists in drafting pleadings, contracts, or opinions affecting client rights.
- Q: Does it apply to paralegals or legal tech vendors?
- A: Directly, only to OAB-registered attorneys; however, law firms remain vicariously responsible for AI tools used by staff or third parties under their supervision.
Key facts
- Official publication date: 12 March 2024 (OAB Gazette No. 01/2024, p. 1–4).
- Full title: “Recomendação OAB/CETED nº 001/2024 – Uso ético da inteligência artificial generativa na advocacia”.
- Adopted by unanimous vote of all 15 CETED members during the 12th Ordinary Session of 2024.
- Cites no foreign instruments; relies exclusively on domestic sources: CF/1988, Law 8.906/1994, OAB Code of Ethics (2022), and CNJ Resolutions.
- Explicitly excludes criminal liability implications—defers those matters to the Public Ministry and judiciary.
Fontes
- OAB Conselho Federal. Recomendação OAB/CETED nº 001/2024. Brasília: OAB, 2024. https://www.oab.org.br/upload/arquivos/2024/03/12/Recomendacao_OAB_CETED_001_2024.pdf
- RAGJur – Banco de Jurisprudência da OAB. “Interpretação Ética da Inteligência Artificial na Advocacia”, atualizado em 15 abr. 2024. https://ragjur.oab.org.br
- Lei nº 8.906/1994 (Estatuto da Advocacia e da OAB), art. 133 e 2º. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8906.htm
- Resolução CNJ nº 392/2021. https://www.cnj.jus.br/resolucao-cnj-392-2021/
Saiba mais em https://g.cloud